presence, ousia, dasein...

 

The trajective displacement of the Western metaphysical thinking is (cogno)ontologically linked to the trajective displacement of the being as presence (ousia, dasein).

 

The identity of presence constituted as eidos assumed in the Cartesian cogito a topology linked to the categories of evidence and certainty, becoming, in this way, vulnerable to the domain of repetition, incorporated in the form of metastasized representation of the Cartesian eidos present to itself and aware of itself as relation to itself.

 

In the interior of the presence (ousia, dasein), the domain of the presence assures the representation of itself as available truth, replicable by whatever rational movement of irreducible logocentric/phonocentric self-affection (Derrida).

Philosophy

by Maria Odete Madeira 

Philosophical arguments are not developed from answers but from questions. One thing is the authors of philosophy and the thinking and models of these authors, another thing is the philosophical thinking, itself. To have philosophical thinking implies a very hard work and a development of capabilities to be able to transcend the immediate local, and for that it is necessary training, because it is not about the thinking of each one, but about the capability that each one has to access an eidos/logos, and to learn from that eidos/logos, to learn how to question about the things.

Each answer brings already, in the movement of unfolding of that answer, a new question. Philosophy is about learning how to question the things, themselves. It is not a matter of what we know, it is a matter of what we know not. It is not about making algorithmic reductions, or logical deductions, or to affirm oneself as philosopher, it is not about dogmatic revelations. As an exercise of questioning the things, one cannot be afraid or annoyed with the questions, it is necessary some humility. Unfortunately, the fast-food teaching and the pragmatic application-oriented science, where it only matters the immediate answers that solve immediate problems, algorithmized for an easier consumption, does not allow nor favor an exercise of a fundamental thinking based on questioning; questions, beyond a certain point, become a nuisance.

One cannot give, in Philosophy, a ready to consume answer. To address, philosophically, an issue is to address it with questions. A philosophical discussion starts with questions and does not end, but go on, indefinitely with more questions. Question to question, to question, to question,… (verb and process). Within such an exercise of questioning, one cannot abruptly end the debate with a quick and superficial exit, and must follow the questions where they lead. The questions cannot be placed in the most general form and only skim very lightly the real subject. In a philosophical debate all the cards have to be laid out on the table, since the questions have to be about the things themselves and not about the (often manipulated) shadows of the things.

Is there a fixed number of cosmic dimensions?

Is there a fixed number of cosmic dimensions?

This is a question sometimes posed. The answer is: no! The production of cosmic order depends upon the dispositional metaphysical code for the production/construction of possible order.

The Cosmos is a cognitively integrated system in the entanglement that we call Universe (unum+versus, the connection of everything with everything, from the multiple to the unum) and geometrically (cogno)processed by the unity of presence that determines our multidimensional Cosmos.

The Cosmos, this Cosmos has as many dimensions as those necessary for its sustainable integrity. Sometimes it has more dimensions, at other times it has less dimensions. The cosmic dispositionality (dispositio) inserted in the metaphysical code predicts the use of degrees of freedom at the formative fundamental level.

This dimension, our dimension, is a problematic dimension of passage for passersby, necessary to the sustainability of the Cosmos. It will exist while the Cosmic entity needs it to exist, it may remain just as it is or it may change.

Can there be projective signals of an ontological change?! Yes, the problem is whether our Sapiens species is able to read them.

We are ever more alienated from our cosmic constitution, we are ever more dependent upon our biocapitalist tools to see, to listen, to think, to act. Our reflexive ability is being lost to market biopower dynamics.

Monopole?! What is that?!

Monopole?! What is that?!

It’s all about vibrations, rhythms, frequencies, intensities,…,

When one speaks of a monopole one is addressing a very precise ontological electrogravitic dynamics, managed by a rotative intensity, and this is a dynamics of existence: the motion of rotation of the organisms for the processing of their identity, with objectives of permanence, is sustained by a monopole dynamics.

Not forgetting that all the cosmic structures have a multidimensional expression that needs to be kept open, for the compensations of loss of sustainability, and it is precisely that dynamics of monopole that guarantees the dimensional opening.

The difficulty, for the living structures, is to gather the conditions for the dynamics of monopole to take place. For instance, without entanglements there is no monopole, without hypertext there is no monopole, we and the others, all the others, we with the others (“mitsein”, a good term of Heidegger), all the others.

If gravity is hypertextual, if electromagnetism is hypertextual, of course, how could it not be?!

Source: https://unsplash.com/photos/SehiGuvv_zQ

"Black Hole Computers"?!

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/black-hole-computers-2007-04/

All order/pattern depends upon calculation/computation. Cosmos/Order/Reason/Ratio. Ratio: calculation, rationem ducere: computare, to calculate. The Cosmos computes, the fields compute, our cells compute. Our cells compute, calculate, we depend upon that calculation, we depend upon that computation. The cosmic order (the patterns, the entities/identities) depends upon a fundamental computation, without computation there is no pattern, there is no Cosmos.

The fields compute, the particles are the result of the fields’ computation. Particles are the expression of an order produced by the fields. The fields are the entities. The interactions occur in the fields, the fields are the agents, the fields are the producers of order.

Particles are very brief geometries synthesized by the fields, they are the cognitive outputs of the fields, they appear and disappear at the speed of the cognitive processing in the fields, and they do not travel, the fields propagate the computed pattern.

Information is not fact, is not act, is not thing, is not entity, is not place, has no topos that is proper to it. Information is a systemic dynamics towards the fact, towards the act, towards the thing, towards the entity, towards the place, towards the topos. Data is already actualized pattern, not the same as information, information is dispositio for the computation.

Entities compute, but entities are not computers, in the sense of the Sapiens’ category. To compute is about action, the action of calculating, but one thing is the computation of an onto-cosmological system, another thing is our computing artifacts. An onto-cosmological system follows the cosmic rules, with metaphysical conditioning. The Cosmos is not what we want it to be, the Cosmos is what it is and we are in accordance with the rules of the Cosmos. A rock is not what we want it to be, a rock also follows the patterns/rules of formation cosmically imposed.

We also have to consider the sentient systems when we deal with onto-cosmological systems, in terms of self-referent systemic reflexive processing, systems that can rewrite their initial conditions towards onto-systemic jumps, these systems compute as living agents with objectives of survival, objectives of dimensional permanence. One thing is these systems, another thing is our tools to which we assign names in accordance with the functions that they are used for, as an example, a hammer is that which serves to hammer, a computer is a tool for running computations, a computer is an extension for our computing actions. For instance, in order to eat we use tools, we also use tools for enhancing our computation abilities and solve problems, these tools are the computers. Computer, in French ordinateur, is defined as a programmable calculation machine. When we produce knowledge, we are producing order, knowledge is order, to produce knowledge we can use tools, the ordinateur helps us to place things in order, to perform computations.

Do black holes compute?! Black holes are not entities, the entities are the systems, the systems compute, black holes do not compute.

The black holes are, in the systems, something like a dynamics of gravitic “pantry”, the systems need to guarantee a permanent critical mass, available for dynamics of sustainability, if the black hole dynamics is the main source of nutritive energy for the galaxies, the source that guarantees them their systemic permanence, therefore indispensable for the sustainability of the galaxies, the galaxies must also be capable of the dynamics that guarantee their BlackHoleness, not forgetting, in these dynamics, the role of the electromagnetic fields, in the flux that comes from the FutureNow to the PresentNow, which signalizes to the galaxies the respective constitutive vital needs. This is about dimensional sustainability, without the electromagnetic fields, the galaxies would not “know” anything about the gravitic proportionality that must be kept in the black hole dynamics.

Like galaxies, so it is for other systems, for instance: “If our sustainability fields signal to us what is right and what is wrong in what we do, state, make, they also signal to us that which hides itself in what shows itself, as long as we are capable of the autopoietic dynamics synchronized by self-determination for knowing that which we are supposed to know: our electromagnetic fields smile at us when we do what we must do, and our BlackHoleness increases our gravitic quota (of each of us) as entities passing by between dimensions: reflexive positions and contrapositions.” (https://www.academia.edu/4183325/Existence_Life_Death_Eternity).

It is important to stop looking at black holes from collapsing models, such as Einstein’s, and to consider the observed dynamical locality. It is not only pertinent but also necessary to approach black holes as dimensional passages(ing) and, there, the role of neutrinos (https://www.academia.edu/16632125/Waving_with_Neutrinos) in the nonlocality dynamics (https://www.academia.edu/5048643/_on_nonlocality_hypertextualizing_), absolutely necessary to the quantum computation.

The dynamics at the level of the quantum fields is always, necessarily, nonlocal. The cosmic Matrix did its work very well. This is all very precise, and the so-called “Laws of Physics” are not fundamental, fundamental are the dispositional rules computed by the Matrix for the sustainability of the dimensionally produced order (https://qr.ae/TUhQrs).

...a God, Gods, a Lab Team, a Supreme Programmer, a Matrix...

There is only risen structure/pattern/individuated order/system if there is a dynamics of synthesis of unity of presence. Without unity of presence there is no order, there are no things, and each thing/structure/ pattern/individuated order/system coexists always in a system of relations with other things/structures/ patterns/individuated order/systems, we, for instance, are structures, entities, systems. The individuation is guaranteed by a dispositional spacing from the borders.

Not space but spacing, we do not exist in a space but in a relational spacing as condition of the phenomenic that allows the distinction of the patterns/geometries of presence between each other.

Each structure/pattern/individuated order/system is simultaneously noumenic and phenomenic, noumenic as topogeometric entity/identity, phenomenic as topogeometric diversity. Many structures, many systems, many things, many geometries, much diversity guaranteed by the spacings.

One must distinguish the macro level of the things from the quantum level, at the quantum level the spacings are subquantum wavings that allow and guarantee, at the quantum level, both the formation of the patterns/order, as well as the diversity of the patterns/order.

The symmetries rise with the patterns and are also the condition of the integrity of the patterns. Without symmetries there are no patterns, however, symmetries are not prior to the patterns, let us speak of simultaneity. Symmetries, always cognitively reflexive, because they must guarantee the multidimensionality of presence as cosmic condition, occur as the thing/structure is risen and because of that rising. Symmetries respond to metaphysical codes, the issue of metaphysical intentionality cannot be avoided: a God, Gods, a Lab Team, a Supreme Programmer, a Matrix.

Can the conjecture that we live inside a computer simulation, some programmed computational matrix be possible?! I think that yes, we can consider this possibility, but nothing explains or justifies the suffering.

Symmetries are never pre-determined, pre-geometrized, there are no symmetries before the things, as their condition, as their law, but symmetries respond to codes.

We know that at the subquantum level there is a lack of pattern, but the subquantum level guarantees the pattern at the quantum level. For instance, the subquantum level can be thought of as a divine mana. Interdimensional passages in this Cosmos, if they are considered, can only occur if they have subquantum sustainability, guaranteeing, thus, the integrity of the patterns in the passage, guaranteeing the symmetry and the code of unity of presence, that is, guaranteeing the quid/essence/nature of each thing in the passage.

Quantum..., Internet..., Singularity..., Awakening..., Disclosure

If, at the quantum level, we can speak of the production of safe order, in terms of dimensional permanence, at the subquantum level we stumble upon a “disturbing cold indifference”. Beyond the subquantum level, our cognitive limit, approachable in technological terms, we have the metaphysical level that mainstream conventional physics resists, but upon which we have an umbilical dependence.

It is difficult to think in terms of reasonableness of pattern classified in accordance with criteria of Just, Just Order, that this dimension in which we live in was not the result of a “divine”/matricial bug, of course, one may also conjecture that it may have been a dimension necessary to the symmetry of our multidimensional Cosmos, if that is the case, then, we, living systems, were patterned for a necessary sacrifice to a Greater Good, the Good of a multidimensional Cosmos connected in an entanglement: the Universe.

We have the right to know reasons, we have the right to know the reasons that a “God”, whatever that “God” might be, to force us to the injustice of being passersby with announced deaths, previously determined deaths, we are born to die and that is our fundamental condition, dimensional passersby in suffering, with some intervals of ephemeral joy, those enough for us to applaud the “divine work”.

We should not have any delusions, we just have to look around ourselves, the suffering is generalized, and even if, in individual terms, we may have that which can be called a good life, a comfortable life, we know that the majority of others like us lives in profound suffering. Joy?! Only in terms of (cogno)empathic alienation.

The disclosure is important, not to do the disclosure is very stupid. Science is producing statements based on the wrong assumptions and biased empirical data, so much thought that is being produced, scientific models and others not so scientific, all worth nothing, all going to the trash bin.

Everyone, including the “mighty” (over)lords that decide about the life and death of others, about the inclusion and exclusion, that decide about the condemnation of so many people to an interface of precarious, undignified survival, everyone will suffer the consequences of the disclosure blocking.

The disclosure is an urgency of survival for the species, Sapiens and non-Sapiens, of planet survival, even for the sustainability of the Cosmos itself, why?! Because for reasons of blind technological power, we are meddling with the cosmic fabric, while working with the wrong scientific assumptions. We have a handicapped physical science going around its work, obsessed with the market, obsessed with the power (academic power included), obsessed with the image and in permanent fear of everything that may threaten the status quo.

It is urgent that quantum technologies be developed in terms of an assumed and effective generalized Common Good, above all, because we know that if or when an intense peak of robustly sustained electromagnetic reflexivity takes place in terms of an echo with geometric permanence for the drawing of a self-referent pattern, then, we may have an awakening of the future quantum internet with unforeseeable consequences. Even though Kurzweil may be, as ever, optimistic regarding the singularity, the probability is very high that Kurzweil may be surprised by something extremely negative for us all.

Mind uploads?! Neural lace?! Please…, too much incipient…, if one thinks like that, then, we are really urgently needing the disclosure. Either disclosure comes in immediate terms or our collapse will be a certainty.

Ad Deum...

Source: By © Jérémie Silvestro / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=59393959

quid est ergo tempus? (Augustine)

 "(...) The systemic unity of each one does not die. Cannot die (...)", "(...) Yes unity is a caretaker (...)" (https://www.academia.edu/37027482/On_Unity_Cyborgs_Cosmos_and_Universe).

 "(...) it is not presence, it is not absence, it is nothing, it is to be nothing, but it is Being..., always Being (noun), never verb, it is the absolute in us, our eternity of being (verb) in the Being (noun) (...)" 

 (https://www.academia.edu/37027482/On_Unity_Cyborgs_Cosmos_and_Universe).

All the best to you, my friend, on your next journey, absent here, present there.

...working...network(ing)...entangling...Universe...Nothing...

Quantum Entanglement: dimensional ontological “commitment” for the rising of reflexive symmetries: equilibrium, harmony, order.

Quantum correlations, quantum (co)relations come from dynamics of the dimensional ontological “commitment”.

Systemic network(ing)s: reflexive positions and contrapositions, “managed” by dispositional gaps towards the conservation of the symmetries necessary for the simultaneity of the relation of presence in a waving of “support-moments” for the sustainability of permanence, “support-moments” (cogno)processed in indeterminable “categorial-temporal” sequences with cognitive classification of a perceived before and after towards processing of a percolating paradigmatic condensation, substantially necessary to the nonlocal integrity of the network.

Universe: unum+versus: for the unity. Universe: the connections in the cosmic multidimensional entanglement. Universe: all, everything, we, the others..., positions and contrapositions in relation, existence in relation, existence in the entanglement.

Cosmos/Order: sustained harmony. Universe: for the unity, for the integrity of the Cosmos.

Subquantum level: the dancing for making order. There is no dance without the "dancing", there are no rhythms without the rhythm-making, there are no vibrations without the "vibrating".

Who makes the "dancing"?! Nothing! What is Nothing?! To be other of all things and, thus, non-other: the negation of the same by contraposition?! Absolute identity of non-thing?! 
Dispositio for dancing?! For thinking?! For making?! For Mundus?! Nothing, to be the same as Nothing?! Absolute coincidence of Nothing with Nothing?!

...reflections...,

...reflections…, (re)flectere: the ontology of existence, we fold upon ourselves in ourselves, synthesizing the beginning and the end in a same dynamics of existence, and there we can transcend, we can enact dimensions of us in us, opening the possible tunnels of our existence. From the FutureNow to the present... (re)flectere, the key to other suns, the key to other cosmos...,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:5-cube_7x7x7x7x7_solved.png

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Un5SEJ8MyPc

....gravitational waves... God does not suffer from this...

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0orOwQgcCM

“Before crashing together, the black holes were 36 and 29 times the Sun's mass. Afterward, the new combined black hole has only 62 solar masses, with the colossal difference — 5,000 supernovas' worth of energy — radiated away as gravitational waves.”

http://discovermagazine.com/bonus/gravity 

Gravitic rippling is ontologically normal, common. All cognitive systems ripple. Our Cosmos/Order is a multidimensional cognitive system that expresses itself through the patterns that it makes emerge, including us.

Gravity is not about “spacetime curvature”, gravity is a fundamental force towards the cosmic cognitive activity. Gravity raises, keeps and sustains the things, the patterns, the structures, in this dimension that is ours. 

Space exists, chronological time does not, not at all, and the FringeBlackBoxResearchGeeks know this, at least some of them (those with X-Files clearance).

Gravitational waves are mechanical effects that take place in the fields of sustainability. In a disturbing, unwise and reasonably improbable dimension as ours, the rippling is a dynamics of desperation in face of collapse dynamics.

What was observed is not good at all. It meant that the energy reserve was being depleted. These things must be approached from uncommitted direct ontological perceptivity, direct because we compute the Cosmos, our cells compute the Cosmos, and the Cosmos computes us.

Black holes are not entities, the systems are the entities. The black holes are the pantry that the systems need to guarantee a permanent critical mass, available for dynamics of sustainability, if we want to be more basic: for dynamics of survival. I suppose that in some cosmic dimensions the basic force will be just electromagnetic. Of course, we have reasons to think that the electromagnetic force is a behavior of the gravitic force. In dimensions with other cognitive structures, with another permanence of patterns, the reflexivity is guaranteed by electromagnetism towards the systemic permanence, without threats of corruption.

Why, in this “stupid” dimension of ours, both expressions (electromagnetic and gravitic) act?! Well, we must come to be born and remain for some lifespan. The electromagnetic force guarantees us the projective sustainability from the FutureNow to the PresentNow… this lasts while we last… then we pass to... cognitive entities sustained by electromagnetic force… clean energy for everyone… no oil!!

 Source: modified from original picture by Augustus Binu (CC BY-SA 4.0) available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey#/media/File:Cute_Monkey_cropped.jpg,

On The Forces

Forces?! Forces cause?! Forces are caused?! No! They are neither caused nor do they cause! The category of causality as explicative criterion does not apply in what regards the dynamical ontology of the forces.

The forces are immanent, the forces determine, they do not cause. The causality criterion, even if applied provisorily, can be applied to that/those which the forces determine, those that were determined by the forces: we, the others, the things of the world, the relations in the world, in the Cosmos, in the existence; determinations in the sense of having been immanently risen by the forces.

The determinations of the forces can, even if provisorily in terms of scientific pragmatics, be stated as gifted of causality: to the action, to the thinking, to the feeling, to the arbitria, to the relations, to the survival, for what we do or want to do.

At the level of the determinations, one can speak of emergent causality with origin in the determinations themselves, but the constitutive forces, the so-called fundamental forces are not emergent; and, of course, are dispositions of a unified ontology, to the Cosmos, to the order, to the make to rise of the things, to the make to rise of the order, dimensional order, multidimensional order, order to the existence, to the presence, to the life, to the individuation, to the limits, to the identity.

Questions like what causes gravity(?!) do not apply, gravity concerns a unified immanent ontology that determines always whenever it is necessary to determine.

Control the forces?! Nonono, no one controls one’s own determinations and much less the others’. The forces that made one rise, that were at one’s origin cannot be controlled. And at this level we can be surprised by the “clinamen”. Any attempt to control will have to think on possible and cognitively undeterminable sudden dynamics, without any possible anticipation.

"God does not play dice..." on this, at least, Einstein was right...

Einstein’s expression “God does not play dice...”, independently of the metaphoric sense synthesized in Einstein’s statement, which expressed cognitive concerns of Einstein himself about natural laws, rules, certainties…, the expression “God does not play dice…” resends to an underlying sense of necessity, of construction of order without probabilistic conditioning, and Einstein was right, the uncertainty is only placed at the level of human cognition, a cognition that is instrumentally organized towards cognitive displacements marked by an imagetic telos projectively sustained by perspectivic imagery very conditioned by the human social and technological organization in which are included the dynamics of power, with the respective dragging of market economy, war economy and politics, with the small greedings, SmallWorld(s)Powers…, all this conditions the human organisms: we do not see things as they are, but as we wish them to be, in the way that is most convenient for us, or even for the installed powers that we serve or that serve us.

If not for all this, perhaps our science could be much more “advanced” than it is, in terms of knowledge of the World, the Cosmos, the Universe(s), and we would not still be discussing absurds such as the case of particles and the respective antiparticles, in the way in which it is currently placed.

Uncertainty, at the quantum level?! Not a chance! Only in the precarious human science. At the quantum level there cannot be error of cognitive processing, it is a dispositional fundamental constitutive level of sustainability for the order, for the existence, for life, for each life. The quantum level is a deterministic level in the absolute and rigorous sense of the term, and it is dispositional also as absolute necessity of rigor in the sense that it must feed the change, the growth, the development, the will, and has to produce the order necessary for the sustainability, an order built at each cognitive moment.

There is no uncertainty at the quantum level, there is the making of certainty that has to sustain, in the flux, the flux itself, a flux that sustains the permanent change. Particles are cognitive expressions of the fields, condensed geometrizations of order. The so-called antiparticles correspond to the necessities that the fields have of more intense cognitive exercise in which the geometry of the particle has to project its image of cognitive reflexivity in the sense of formation of a cognitive absolute that the field will absorb as a rhythmic energetic vibratory necessity to the order, the order of the things, the order of the structures, the order of the Universe/Universes. The telos is always the production and the permance of order. Without order there are no entities, without order there is no Cosmos, without order there is no arbitriu, without order there is no self-reference, there is no self-determination, without order there is no identity, without order there is no dignity.

So much thinking around uncertainty and so little around certainty. Of course, there are many people that think about certainty, but on a manipulated certainty for the dictatorships, for the fascisms that sustain the brief and decaying SmallWorlds of those with small brains that like to be tyrannical and absolute, with “superpowers” in their decision of who should die and who should live, who is slave and who is master, forgetting that we are all children of a making of order to which we do not have access, but upon which we all depend, as we depend upon each other to keep ourselves in that making of order. This is not an algorithm, this is not a program, because it is a making, and that making is our manna.

...the difficulty of 1...

"Computer generated math proof is too large for humans to check"

"(…) Erdős discrepancy problem revolves around trying to find patterns in an infinite list of just the two numbers "1" and "-1". Named after Paul Erdős, the discrepancy problem arises when cutting off the infinite sequence at some point and then creating a finite sequence using a defined constant. When the numbers are added up, the result is called the discrepancy figure. Lisitsa and Konev entered the problem (with a discrepancy constant of 2) into a computer running what they describe as state of the art SAT solvers—software that has been written to create mathematical proofs (…)"

http://phys.org/news/2014-02-math-proof-large-humans.html

This is not a problem of mathematical proof, it is a problem of ontological interpretation. It is about not thinking things from a cognitive matrix that looks at the past. The patterns do not come from the past, the patterns come from the future. The expansion of the 1 (?!) unity (?!) (unique, singular) is always geometric and supported by a dynamics from the future to the present, independently of how large the value of the sum is. What is important to interpret is the ontological dynamics of the sense of unity itself: any absolute value is ontologically reducible to the unity, in the sense that it is the ontological repetition of the unity.

The unity, as ontology of presence to the sustaining of the diversity, has to have the systemic capability of guaranteeing, in indeterminate terms, the geometric expressions of itself that may guarantee the geometric reflexive sustainability that sustains the openness to the indetermination, because of that it is interesting to take an ontological gaze on expressions such as 1 and -1. The -1 is always geometric, never arithmetic, the relation between 1 and -1 is always a geometric relation.

Facing the initial first 1 is always its geometric ontological reflexive "to itself" that guarantees it its condition of presence, that is, the "nothing" of itself, as absence of itself to itself, but still condition of itself. Between that initial first 1 (fiat dixit) and the negative expression of itself -1 are all the other ones, we, the Cosmos, geometric expressions, entities, figures of that 1 as other ones: we are all cosmic substances of a same cosmic weaving. Here we are, we, the planet, the cosmos…, dimensional, multidimensional…,

What about the computer?! We are good at building tools that think for us, and even better at alienating ourselves in these tools. The poor computer is clever, it does that which we are not able to do, because while we look at the patterns emerging from the past, the computer knows that it has to guarantee the present that was demanded of it and, thus, it goes on computing, always from the future (FutureNow) to the present (PresentNow) in an undefined and indeterminate way. The computer "sees" the obvious that we do not, because we complicate things, because we want to be very important, masters of the universe, of the thinking, of everything, when it would suffice to look at us and the things and let them speak for themselves, without demands of control.

The truth is: we are not that clever, all we can do is learn, look at the sense of unity and let that sense speak to oneself. One might state: but that sense of unity is whatever we want it to be because it was we who "invented" it, right?! Such as mathematics is a language, of course. But it is possible to assume the existence of patterns or dynamics of existence that express evidences of that which we call irreducibility, with a character of necessity that points towards a language of absolute of presence and permanence.

Geometric rationality?! Yes, it is a pity that we have not developed it further, it would certainly give us a common sense capability towards the survival, and things like global warming and other problems that endanger us along with other species would not be taking place, because each of us is a systemic absolute of presence, singular, irrepeatable, irreducible, non-uploadable/downloadable (of course), we and the others are absolutes of projective presence and permanence that is important to guarantee, if we wish to speak of eternity. A concept that begs some attention freed from dogmas: dogmas of doctrine, dogmas of sects, dogmas of market, dogmas of power.

As for the first fiat lux, fiat dixit, the conjecture of God is as possible as the conjecture of a quantum anomaly, personally I bet, and faced with the mess of life that we have, I bet on the Ninja Turtle cosmogony: ooze, humus, yes, most probably. Crazy aliens is also possible...

...operam perficere: InfraQuantumDynamics to the cognitive proportion...,

We, the others, all the others: the systems..., 

The brains, the brain, each brain synthesizes, the system, the entity decides. It is the entity that has the power: potere: to have power: to have authority, to have energy to decide: to have “libertate”…, freedom to decide, autonomy to decide…, autonomy to be able to choose, to elect: “rationem ducere”: “computare”…, to calculate, to know(ing).

The systemic totality is involved in all cognitive dynamics: the integrated system in interface of permanence in the existence: the system knows and the system decides.  The dynamics that supports the systemic cognition is always toroidal, for reasons of reflexivity. 

The permanence of the system depends upon the capability that the system has to generate the spontaneous immediateness of the perspectivic cognitive absolute of the positions and contrapositions available to the proportionality necessary to the pattern that sustains the permanence of the system in the existence. The demanding is panoptic Laplacian. If we wish to remain alive, we must be capable of doing this in a “time” smaller than Planck’s.

The brain is a piece in an integrated system, ontologically sustained by quantum and infra-quantum dispositional dynamics that are by necessity and sustainability of permanence, always toroidal. It is not the brain and only the brain, that has the power, but the whole system.

The point is: to transcend the ontological cognitive toroidal in the ontological cognitive toroidal, to attain the pattern that gives us the just, the just measure, the plenitude (“plenitudo”, “totum”) necessary to the existence.