On The Forces

Forces?! Forces cause?! Forces are caused?! No! They are neither caused nor do they cause! The category of causality as explicative criterion does not apply in what regards the dynamical ontology of the forces.

The forces are immanent, the forces determine, they do not cause. The causality criterion, even if applied provisorily, can be applied to that/those which the forces determine, those that were determined by the forces: we, the others, the things of the world, the relations in the world, in the Cosmos, in the existence; determinations in the sense of having been immanently risen by the forces.

The determinations of the forces can, even if provisorily in terms of scientific pragmatics, be stated as gifted of causality: to the action, to the thinking, to the feeling, to the arbitria, to the relations, to the survival, for what we do or want to do.

At the level of the determinations, one can speak of emergent causality with origin in the determinations themselves, but the constitutive forces, the so-called fundamental forces are not emergent; and, of course, are dispositions of a unified ontology, to the Cosmos, to the order, to the make to rise of the things, to the make to rise of the order, dimensional order, multidimensional order, order to the existence, to the presence, to the life, to the individuation, to the limits, to the identity.

Questions like what causes gravity(?!) do not apply, gravity concerns a unified immanent ontology that determines always whenever it is necessary to determine.

Control the forces?! Nonono, no one controls one’s own determinations and much less the others’. The forces that made one rise, that were at one’s origin cannot be controlled. And at this level we can be surprised by the “clinamen”. Any attempt to control will have to think on possible and cognitively undeterminable sudden dynamics, without any possible anticipation.

"God does not play dice..." on this, at least, Einstein was right...

Einstein’s expression “God does not play dice...”, independently of the metaphoric sense synthesized in Einstein’s statement, which expressed cognitive concerns of Einstein himself about natural laws, rules, certainties…, the expression “God does not play dice…” resends to an underlying sense of necessity, of construction of order without probabilistic conditioning, and Einstein was right, the uncertainty is only placed at the level of human cognition, a cognition that is instrumentally organized towards cognitive displacements marked by an imagetic telos projectively sustained by perspectivic imagery very conditioned by the human social and technological organization in which are included the dynamics of power, with the respective dragging of market economy, war economy and politics, with the small greedings, SmallWorld(s)Powers…, all this conditions the human organisms: we do not see things as they are, but as we wish them to be, in the way that is most convenient for us, or even for the installed powers that we serve or that serve us.

If not for all this, perhaps our science could be much more “advanced” than it is, in terms of knowledge of the World, the Cosmos, the Universe(s), and we would not still be discussing absurds such as the case of particles and the respective antiparticles, in the way in which it is currently placed.

Uncertainty, at the quantum level?! Not a chance! Only in the precarious human science. At the quantum level there cannot be error of cognitive processing, it is a dispositional fundamental constitutive level of sustainability for the order, for the existence, for life, for each life. The quantum level is a deterministic level in the absolute and rigorous sense of the term, and it is dispositional also as absolute necessity of rigor in the sense that it must feed the change, the growth, the development, the will, and has to produce the order necessary for the sustainability, an order built at each cognitive moment.

There is no uncertainty at the quantum level, there is the making of certainty that has to sustain, in the flux, the flux itself, a flux that sustains the permanent change. Particles are cognitive expressions of the fields, condensed geometrizations of order. The so-called antiparticles correspond to the necessities that the fields have of more intense cognitive exercise in which the geometry of the particle has to project its image of cognitive reflexivity in the sense of formation of a cognitive absolute that the field will absorb as a rhythmic energetic vibratory necessity to the order, the order of the things, the order of the structures, the order of the Universe/Universes. The telos is always the production and the permance of order. Without order there are no entities, without order there is no Cosmos, without order there is no arbitriu, without order there is no self-reference, there is no self-determination, without order there is no identity, without order there is no dignity.

So much thinking around uncertainty and so little around certainty. Of course, there are many people that think about certainty, but on a manipulated certainty for the dictatorships, for the fascisms that sustain the brief and decaying SmallWorlds of those with small brains that like to be tyrannical and absolute, with “superpowers” in their decision of who should die and who should live, who is slave and who is master, forgetting that we are all children of a making of order to which we do not have access, but upon which we all depend, as we depend upon each other to keep ourselves in that making of order. This is not an algorithm, this is not a program, because it is a making, and that making is our manna.