Things, Good, Perfection...,

In philosophical terms, the Good (Bene) is postulated as a coincidence between the being and the “to must be” (obligation, imperative) and, thus, the good (bene) of a thing is the coincidence between what that thing is and what it must be (necessity), as synchronized resonating rotative coincidence of itself, or, in other words, individuated identity.

Linked to the notion of Good (Bene) is the notion of perfection, from the Latin perfectio, with origin in per+facere and whose prefix indicates a finished action. The notion of perfection synthesizes, thus, an idea of completion.

Any living structure, because of the fact that it is and, as such, exists, it also, necessarily, “must be” (obligation, imperative) and, thus, it is good (bene).

Any living sucture is necessarily complete, and, thus, perfect.

Any living structure: cell, virus, stone, ant, plant, rat, human, star, black hole, etc… is good (bene) and, thus, it is perfect.

,...holography; hologram...,

It is reasonably legitimate to postulate the holography as a “systemic property”, but it is not legitimate to reduce the system to its holographic record. The holography is systemic, but it is not the system.

The hologram, like the holography, is systemic but it is not the system. The hologram is the output of the system’s identity, computed in a strange loop and that includes the whole data of the system, including its initial conditions.

…neutrinos… what are they?

…neutrinos… what are they? Gravitic phenomenon evoked, in the systems, by the presence of the gap, of the zero…, neutrinos... pieces of the form of the worlds that attach themselves to the “aion gaps”…

fundament: ratio/reason...

By: Maria Odete Madeira

In a statement, the fundament is the ratio/reason prior and interior to the statement of which it is the fundament.

If the fundament of an event is unknown, then, the nature of the event in what regards its fundamental causality remains unknown.

...the there-of-the-being…

By: Maria Odete Madeira

The anticipation of the future, the recovering of the past and the opening of the present constitute, in Heidegger’s thinking, experiences of the human discovery of the sense of the being of the Dasein, that is: its temporality, the there-of-the-being, the topos of the discovery of the being, placed in the existence as being-the-there, that is: being ente, being that one, or that thing that refers itself and addresses the being, itself, as ontological difference of the same being projected towards the anticipated future... losing itself in the decadence of the present that lives the anguish of having been.

Between the paradox and the antinomy...

By: Maria Odete Madeira

Veritas acquist exegesis aliqua res...

Between the paradox and the antinomy there is a fundamental ontologic and epistemic difference, marked by the resonating rotative interval of the rhythmic meaning (significado) of the genetic interval of separation between the topologies of the “in itself” (em si) and of the “to itself” (para si), approachable from the systemic notions: ontology-in-web and ethos-in-web.

Perhaps more interesting than the meanings of each of the terms (paradox and antinomy), may be the perception, reflection and the respective cognitive processing of the ontologic difference.

...,ambiguitas...

By: Maria Odete Madeira

In an amphibology (amphibolia,…, ambiguitas, atis) of the Being and of the ens/ente (the one that is, quod est), the human ear is seduced by the resonance of the Verb: the dictum, as Verb, displaces the essence of the Essence as constituent difference between the Being in the Being and the Nothing in the “Same Being”, in a simultaneity of the Being, itself, as rotative metabolized processing of “Itself”: Being and Nothing…, …

…Paradox? Are there Paradoxes? How could there not be Paradoxes?