Planck gap? Planck energy? Gappiness in Planck?
It is not the case that Planck’s energy is some thing that can be actualized. It does not have that dispositional nature, it cannot be approached as a dispositional nature.
Planck energy? Is energy a good term? Is it some thing like energy or is it a neutral thing which is towards energy, but not energy itself?
Is it a gift? A medium? A gap? A “Manna” for the thing that is being/making, as its fundamental possibility(?)...
...simultaneously a presence/absence, presence because it is computed by the cells, absence because it does not exist as a concrete thing.
Perhaps..., in the “Planck’s gap” is projectively compressed all the information of the originating dynamics present in the formation of our cosmic system and that accompanies us, because we depend upon it evolutionarily, it has to do with that which we were in the beginning and that which we are in the end as things that are born, die, and are.
The information, in this case, is not some thing that is measured, weighed, packaged and launched in the market of knowledge as object of consumption, by information, in this case, one must understand some thing like an "Apeiron", very close (but not the same) to the sense that Plotinus gave it: as an alterity-there (Aoristos).
Things, sometimes, are far more simple than they appear. Although, it may be a bit complicated to understand how our cells enact the reflexibility that makes emerge the projection of that gap that can be called “umbilical cord”/“umbilical string(?, perhaps...)”.
Our cells process-to-enact themselves and through the gap.
Through enactive reflexivity the gap provides for the “aion nexus” between the thing’s reflexivity and its reflexibility to itself: “to einai”.
No comments:
Post a Comment